Gruschus Ex Rel. Estate of Adams v. Bureau of Revenue
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NOBLE, Justice.
Prior to March 31, 1961, the Jack Adams Construction Company entered into five unit price contracts for the construction of particular highway projects, under which no increase in price could be made because of sales taxes subsequently enacted and imposed. Chapter 195, Laws 1961 became effective on that date and removed the exemption of sales of services to the State from the privilege tax imposed on contractors, thus making that tax apply prospectively to gross receipts from these contracts. Recognizing that many such contracts had already been entered into, the terms of which…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alabama v. King & BoozerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Burch v. FoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
- Davy v. McNeillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
- State Ex Rel. Hannah v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. BurkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Richardson Ex Rel. Estate of Richardson v. Carnegie Library Restaurant, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Garcia on Behalf of Garcia v. La FargeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Cummings v. X-Ray Associates of New Mexico, P. C.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- McGeehan v. BunchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.