Penrose v. Mitchell Bros. Crane Division, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FORT, J. (Pro Tempore).
At the time of his injury plaintiff was employed by the Howard Brewton Company as a laborer. His employer was engaged as a general contractor in the construction of a building. The work, so far as here pertinent, • involved the erection of precast concrete wall panels weighing approximately 25 tons each. In order to erect these wall panels, plaintiff’s employer, Brewton, rented a self-operating mobile crane from the defendant. Such a unit is a costly and complicated piece of machinery. The defendant furnished two of its own employees, both experienced specialists, with…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Thomas v. FoglioOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Warner v. SynnesOregon Supreme Court · 1924
- Pruett v. LININGEROregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Galer v. WEYERHAEUSER TIMBER CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Simpson v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF PROVIDENCE, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Tenold v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Nakagawa v. ApanaHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Bass v. DUNTHORPE MOTOR TRANSPORT CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Construction Consulting AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.