McDonald v. Ford Motor Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.
This is a product liability action brought under the theory of implied warranty, which is a form of strict liability in tort. The plaintiff’s burden of proof for breach of implied warranty, as stated by this court “* * * consists of alleging and proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that: (1) There was, in fact, a defect in the product manufactured and sold by the defendant; (2) such defect existed at the time the product left the hands of the defendant; and (3) the defect was the direct and proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries or loss.” State Auto Mutual Ins. Co. v. Chrysler…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- State Auto Mutual Ins. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd. Co. v. RohrsOhio Supreme Court · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Ruby Harris v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Jensen v. American Motors Corp., Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Donaldson v. Northern Trading Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Atkins v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.