Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Ford Motor Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1975No. 74-139PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.

This is a product liability action brought under the theory of implied warranty, which is a form of strict liability in tort. The plaintiff’s burden of proof for breach of implied warranty, as stated by this court “* * * consists of alleging and proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that: (1) There was, in fact, a defect in the product manufactured and sold by the defendant; (2) such defect existed at the time the product left the hands of the defendant; and (3) the defect was the direct and proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injuries or loss.” State Auto Mutual Ins. Co. v. Chrysler…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Lonzrick v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State Auto Mutual Ins. v. Chrysler Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Rd. Co. v. RohrsOhio Supreme Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ruby Harris v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Jensen v. American Motors Corp., Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. Donaldson v. Northern Trading Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Atkins v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API