Legal Opinion

Ganim v. Village of New York Mills

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1973Published

1Opinion of the Court

Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., J.

The question in this article 78 proceeding is whether the existing nonconforming use of petitioners’ property — as a three- or four-family dwelling— may be changed without permission under the New York Mills Zoning Ordinance adopted in June of 1970 to a rooming or boarding house to be used in conjunction with a family care program under section 34 of the Mental Hygiene Law to be administered by Utica State Hospital.

The provision of the zoning ordinance pertaining to changes in nonconforming uses is as follows; “3. Changes. A non*654conforming nse may be changed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. MurdockNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Jewish Consumptives' Relief Society v. Town of WoodburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. Salvation Army of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Shegda v. Village of LancasterNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Unteed v. Lehman, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API