Danko v. Redway Enterprises, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
This certified appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court raises two principal issues: (1) whether, as a general rule, statements made in a stricken pleading are admissible as evidential admissions of the party who pleaded them; and (2) if so, whether statements in a stricken apportionment complaint are subject to that general rule. We answer each of these questions in the affirmative. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The relevant facts and procedural history are set forth in the opinion of the Appellate Court. “On September 18, 1993, [the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- DeVita v. EspositoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bovat v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. AllenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Brennan v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Grovenburg v. Rustle Meadow Associates, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.