Legal Opinion
Brennan v. Town of Fairfield
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 17, 2001No. SC 16342PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether notice is timely when it is received *695by a town official on the ninety-second day, under a ninety day notice statute, when the municipal office that is authorized to receive the notice is closed on the ninetieth and ninety-first days. Following our grant of certification,1 the plaintiff, Mary Brennan, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court granting the motion to dismiss filed by the defendant, the town of Fairfield. The plaintiff claims that: (1) notice that is received…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Pratt v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Norwich Land Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Lamberti v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Lussier v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Himmelstein v. Town of WindsorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Nine State Street, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Vejseli v. PashaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Secretary of Office of Policy & Management v. Employees' Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.