Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Davila

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 15, 2014No. 10-15310, 11-10224PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

2Per curiam

In United States v. Davila, 664 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir.2011) (“Davila I”), Anthony Davila argued — for the first time on appeal — that a Magistrate Judge’s comments during a pre-plea hearing constituted improper judicial participation in plea discussions in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1). 1 Davila I, 664 F.3d at 1357-58. Pursuant to circuit precedent mandating automatic vacatur in such a situation, we vacated Davila’s conviction and remanded the case to the District Court. Id. at 1359. The Supreme Court granted…

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Oluwaseun SanyaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Freddie WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Mario WilchcombeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. Daniel Ushery, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. Derrick Harrell, Corwin DantzleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API