Legal Opinion
United States v. Derrick Harrell, Corwin Dantzle
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 14, 2014No. 11-15680PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JORDAN, Circuit Judge:
Derrick Harrell and Corwin Dantzle appeal from their convictions for conspiracy to commit robbery and two counts of robbery (one of a Walgreens, the other of a McDonald’s), both in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), and for two counts of having used, carried, or possessed a firearm in relation to the robberies, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A).
Mr. Harrell pleaded guilty to the charges and received an agreed-upon sentence of 25 years’ imprisonment. He argues for the first time on appeal that the district court impermissibly participated in the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. MarcusSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Rosemond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Daniel Ushery, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Fred ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- In re United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Javarese HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
- State Of Washington v. Kevin Richard HubbardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.