Legal Opinion

United States v. Mario Wilchcombe

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 4, 2016No. 14-14991PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Mario Wilchcombe, Nathaniel Erskine Rolle, and Alteme Hiberdieu Beauplant appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Altonaga, J.) following a jury trial convicting (1) all defendants of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute and possessing with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and 100 kilograms or more of marijuana while on board a vessel subject to U.S. jurisdiction, in violation of 46 U.S.C. §§ 70503(a) and (b) and 70506(a), 21 U.S.C. §§ 960(b)(1)(B) and (2)(G) and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Beverly A. Seymour v. Diane Walker,respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Salinas v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. United States v. Serge EdouardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. OrrSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. United States v. Trinity Rolando Cabezas-MontanoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Wuilson Estuardo Lemus CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Elder Nehemias Lopez HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. Justo Jonah SantosCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API