Adcock v. King
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CHADICK, Justice.
This action was instituted by the plaintiff to secure injunctive relief as well as, a writ of mandamus to compel the defendant to issue a permit to repair a building damaged by fire, together with such other relief as the court deemed proper. The trial court entered judgment for the plaintiff. The judgment of the trial court is modified and affirmed.
The general statement of the case in appellant’s brief, approved as substantially correct by the appellee, is adopted, to-wit:
“This is a suit brought by Harold King, the Operator of Acme Auto Parts against Aubrey Adc'ock, the City…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Bednarz v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Coalson v. HolmesTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Amarillo v. StapfTexas Supreme Court · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lamar Corp. v. City of Longview, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- City of Pharr v. Pena, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1993
- In the Interest of S. R. M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Riggs v. Tech/III, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Nash v. City of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.