Legal Opinion

Riggs v. Tech/III, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 4, 1992No. 05-92-01053-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENOCH, Chief Justice.

Appellant Robert Riggs appeals, by petition for writ of error, a default judgment in favor of appellee Tech/III, Inc. He has filed a “motion for extension of time to file supplemental transcript.” For the reasons stated below, we will treat the motion as a motion to extend the time to file the statement of facts. We grant the motion.

Riggs wishes to introduce into the record on appeal a court reporter’s affidavit stating that the hearing resulting in the default judgment was not recorded. 1 A court reporter’s affidavit or certificate is the appropriate way of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. BD CLICK CO. INC. v. Safari Drilling Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Perry v. Kroger Stores, Store No. 119, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  3. Crown Life Insurance Co. v. Estate of GonzalezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Morgan Express, Inc. v. Elizabeth-Perkins, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Deerfield Land Joint Venture v. Southern Union Realty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Garner v. LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. In Re Cervantes, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
  3. Daniels v. University of Texas Health Science Center of Tyler, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2004
  4. Fazio v. HamesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Railroad Commission v. Belknap Van & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API