Legal Opinion

Coalson v. Holmes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1922No. 2891PublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

Plaintiff in error sued defendant in error, in the District Court of Parker County, to recover damages for fraud in an exchange of lands.

Plaintiff in error alleged that Allen and Rockwell, as agents of defendant in error, wrote plaintiff in error a letter, addressed to him at his postoffice in Parker County and which he there received, stating that certain lots which defendant in error offered to exchange for land of plaintiff in error were improved lots in Fort Worth, with 32 three-room rent houses, about two years old, nicely papered and painted, a deep well, a wind mill, a,n electric pump…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thomson v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MuseTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hilliard Bros. v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Palmo v. S. W. Slayden & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Compton v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Belo Corp. v. Thomas BlantonTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Farmers' Seed & Gin Co. v. BrooksTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Meredith v. McClendonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Meredith v. McClendonTexas Supreme Court · 1938

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API