Legal Opinion
Nash v. City of Lubbock
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 21, 1994No. 07-94-0045-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.
Aggrieved by a take-nothing summary judgment rendered in their action to recover damages from the City of Lubbock and the Housing Standards Commission of the City of Lubbock (collectively the HSC) for the demolition of their buildings, Sanco Nash, Jr. and his wife, Dorothy Nash (the Nashes), contend with a general point of error that the trial court erred in granting the HSC’s motion for summary judgment and in denying their motion for summary judgment. Based upon the rationale expressed, we will affirm.
The record reveals that at an HSC hearing on 14 January 1986,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Lower Colorado River Authority v. City of San MarcosTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CrankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Fire Department v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hidden Oaks Limited, Hidden Oaks Limited, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. The City of Austin, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Hidden Oaks Ltd v. The City of AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Susan C. Lee v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006