Legal Opinion
United States v. Matus-Zayas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 24, 2011No. 09-10294PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Juan Leonardo Matus-Zayas appeals his conviction on various counts related to transporting and harboring illegal aliens. Matus-Zayas specifically challenges the district court’s decision to admit into evidence videotaped deposition testimony of detained material witnesses pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3144. For the first time on appeal, Matus-Zayas argues that the statute is facially invalid and that the court erred by permitting the government to admit the depositions .into evidence at trial without any showing of a witness’s unavailability. He also argues…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BaramdykaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. HammonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Charly Sion Hagege, United States of America v. Charly Sion HagegeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Doyle E. Campbell, Doyle E. Campbell, M.D., Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Valentino JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. SolorioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Chao Fan XuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- State v. TribbleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- United States v. Arturo EsparzaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.