Legal Opinion
United States v. Solorio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 19, 2012No. 10-10304PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Carlos Quintana Solorio (“Solorio”) was arrested during a Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) “buy bust” operation for arranging to sell methamphetamine to a government informant. 1 Following a jury trial, Solorio was convicted of possession with intent to distribute 500 or more grams of a substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(viii), and conspiracy to distribute 500 or more grams of a substance containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.
Solorio now appeals his conviction on four grounds, contending…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. ShabaniSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Rafiq BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. HayatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Rivera-ClementeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.