Legal Opinion
United States v. Chao Fan Xu
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 3, 2013No. 09-10189, 09-10193, 09-10201, 09-10202PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
Four Chinese nationals appeal their convictions and sentences for federal crimes that they committed as part of a scheme to steal funds from the Bank of China, where two of the defendants were high-level employees, and to escape prosecution and retain the proceeds by illegal transfers of funds and by immigration fraud. We affirm the convictions, and vacate the sentences and remand for resentencing.
Defendants Xu Chaofan (“Chaofan”), Xu Guojun (“Guojun”), Yu Ying Yi (“Yingyi”), and Kuang Wan Fang (‘Wanfang”) 1 (collectively, “Defendants”), challenge the application…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. European Cmty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- CGC Holding Co. v. Broad & CasselCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Devincci Hourani v. Alexander MirtchevCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.