Legal Opinion
Continental Insurance Co. v. Schneider, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 21, 2002PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
ORIE MELVIN,. J.
¶ 1 Continental Insurance Company appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Vanadium Enterprises Corporation, S.E. Technologies, Inc., S.S.I. Services, Inc., Jones Krall, Inc., and Construction Rental and Supply, Inc. (collectively “Vanadium”), and dismissal of the complaint as to those parties. 1 In a case of first impression in this Commonwealth, we are asked to determine whether the sale of assets by a secured creditor pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) precludes recovery by a general creditor of the predecessor entity under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Stanley Knapp, Jr. v. North American Rockwell Corporation v. Mrs. Smith's Pie Company, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Glynwed, Inc. v. Plastimatic, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Hill v. Trailmobile, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Continental Insurance v. Schneider, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Fizzano Brothers Concrete Products, Inc. v. XLN, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Bird Hill Farms, Inc. v. United States Cargo & Courier Service, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Yankee Gas Services Co. v. UGI Utilities, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.