Legal Opinion

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Triton Oil and Gas Corporation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 14, 1984No. 84-5088PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

WALD, Circuit Judge:

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) appeals from a decision of the district court holding that the appropriate interest rate to be applied to refund obligations incurred by Triton Oil and Gas Corporation (“Triton”) under the refund requirements of the Commission’s Opinion No. 598 1 is the 7% interest rate specified in Opinion No. 598 and not the Commission’s general, higher rate of interest established in its regulations, 18 C.F.R. § 154.102(c)(2) (1984), issued subsequent to Opinion No. 598. We affirm…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Placid Oil Company, Sola II v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  4. Boston Edison Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  5. American Public Gas Association v. Federal Power Commission, American Public Power Association, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Southeastern Michigan Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  2. Qwest Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  4. Amoco Production Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. New England Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Gte Service Corp., National Telephone Cooperative Association, American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Ameritech Operating Co., Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., Satellite Business Systems, U.S. Telephone Association, Telecommunication Research & Action Center, South Central Bell Telephone Co., Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Intervenors. American Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, U.S. Telephone Association, Gte Service Corp., Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., Bell Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Intervenors. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Gte Service Corp., Ameritech Operating Co., American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Bell Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., Intervenors. Pacific Bell v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Gte Service Corp., Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co., Ameritech Operating Co., American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Bell Operating Companies, Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API