Legal Opinion
Boston Edison Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 17, 1977No. 75-2123, 76-1392PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILKEY.
WILKEY, Circuit Judge:
This proceeding consolidates two petitions for review of respondent’s orders1 emanating from petitioner’s S-42 rate filing. The legal issue posed is whether after a wholesale electrical rate application has been filed, presenting cost data deemed current by then-existing regulations, the Commission by subsequent general regulation can declare the data stale and reject the application.3
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On 27 August 1975 petitioner filed its S-4 rate schedule for a rate increase conforming to the regulations…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Greater Boston Television Corp. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Company v. Federal Power Commission, Richmond Power and Light of the City of Richmond, Indiana,intervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Golden Holiday Tours v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
3Cited by30 opinions
- Edwin I. Hatch v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Yongyouth Ruangswang and Vanapar Ruangswang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Pine Tree Medical Associates v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Kent Mason, Patricia Warren and Leorlin Boyd v. Department of Transportation, Drew Lewis, as Secretary, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and Raymond A. Peck, Jr., as Administrator, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Automobile Importers of America, Inc., Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association, Consumer Alert and Pacific Legal Foundation, Intervenors. National Association of Independent Insurers, Automobile Owners Action Council, and Eugene J. Meyung v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Automobile Importers of America, Inc., Consumer Alert and Pacific Legal Foundation, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.