Legal Opinion

State v. Gesell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1917No. Nos. 20,418 — (3)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Defendant was indicted by the grand jury charged with the crime of assault in the second degree upon an officer, tried in the district court for Pennington county before Grindeland, J., and a jury which returned a verdict of guilty as charged. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Defendant was indicted, charged with resisting a police officer, tried and convicted -of assault in the second degree, and, from an order denying his motion for a new trial, he appealed.

On the day in question, May 26, 1916, defendant resided in a cottage on the west side of Horace avenue, in the city of Thief River Falls in Pennington county. He was a cigar maker and had his factory across the street from his residence. The chief of police of the city had a warrant for the arrest of defendant for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor, also a search warrant to search his premises, both…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Baumgartner v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. FrostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. State v. TremontSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API