State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Defendant .was convicted of grand larceny and appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. There is undisputed evidence that some 60 bushels of potatoes owned by one Shoberg were stolen from his root cellar on or about the date stated in the information; and, while the evidence does not show the exact hour of the theft, it is amply sufficient to justify the jury in finding that the potatoes were taken in the nighttime.
2. The evidence to show that defendant was the person who committed the larceny is circumstantial only. It shows his familiarity with the premises; his…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Winget v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- State v. UpsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. Al-NaseerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. TscheuSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.