State v. Frost
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Defendant was convicted of an unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor and has appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The information charged a sale to a man named Corey. Over defendant’s objection, evidence was received of sales to another man at about the same time. That such evidence is admissible is no longer an open question in this state. State v. Peterson, 98 Minn. 210, 108 N. W. 6; State v. Gesell, 137 Minn. 43, 162 N. W. 683.
The place of sale alleged was the township of Geneva in Freeborn county. The proof was that Corey and a companion named Bagley went to defendant’s store…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CantienySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- State v. HesseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- State v. GrearSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. TrezonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. BahriCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. KaczorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- McFetridge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.