Baumgartner v. State
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Coconino. George H. Crosby, Jr., Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
The appellant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor to W." A. Shackley, and appeals.
It appears from the testimony that the Thiels Detective Service Company was employed by the county of Coconino to procure evidence of violations, if any, of the prohibition amendment in that county; that, pursuant to this employment, the *159company sent three of its detectives, W. A. Shackley, H. C. Whitney and C. W. Penturf, to Coconino county to proeure such evidence; that the appellant was engaged in the business of stock-raising and also, at the time of the commission of the alleged offense, operated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. TeahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
- Duff v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1918
- Wakeman v. ChambersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- State v. GesellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Porras v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. LambrightArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SorensenArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. BranchArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- Dickerson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.