Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Woodward Con. Co., N. Util.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1949No. 2395 and 2396PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Blume, Justice.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs, Samuel J. Phelps and Leah Phelps, against the defendants for damages in the sum of §10,500 on account of the wrongful destruction of their home in Bock Springs, Wyoming, by gas explosion. The court found in favor of the plaintiffs and against the Northern Utilities Company and rendered judgment against the latter for the sum of 88,395 and costs. That company has appealed to this court, assigning as error that the judgment is contrary to law and contrary to the evidence and not sustained by the evidence. The court found in favor…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stockwell v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Loney v. Laramie Auto Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  3. LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Richey & Gilbert Co. v. Northwestern Natural Gas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Anderson v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  2. Preston A. Parkinson v. The California Company, a Corporation and Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Buckley v. BellWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Natural Gas Processing Co. v. HullWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Rocky Mountain Trucking Co. v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1959

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API