Legal Opinion
Keene v. Smith
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 7, 1983No. CIV. S-83-287 RARPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
RAMIREZ, District Judge.
On May 23, 1983, the above-entitled matter came on regularly for hearing on plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and defendants’ motion to dismiss. Having read and considered the memoranda submitted by counsel, the attachments thereto, the pleadings, and the arguments of respective counsel, the Court herein grants plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and denies defendants’ motion to dismiss. The following shall constitute the Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meese v. KeeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell Block, President, Direct Cinema Ltd., Inc. v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Amnesty International USA v. ClapperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Keene v. MeeseDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
- Block v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.