Legal Opinion
Keene v. Meese
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 29, 1985No. Civ.S-83-287 RARPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RAMIREZ, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter came on specially for hearing by way of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on August 8, 1984. John G. Donhoff, Esq., appeared as counsel for the plaintiff, BARRY KEENE, and David J. Anderson, Esq., United States Department of Justice, appeared as counsel for the defendants, EDWIN MEESE, et al. Having read and considered the briefs and arguments presented by respective counsel, the Court herein renders its decision on the various motions.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Meese v. KeeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell Block, President, Direct Cinema Ltd., Inc. v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Griffin v. BryantDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. WickDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.