Legal Opinion

Mitchell Block, President, Direct Cinema Ltd., Inc. v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 18, 1986No. 84-5318PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCALIA, Circuit Judge:

This case concerns the Justice Department’s classification of three films as “political propaganda” under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, and its consequent application of its regulations requiring the foreign agent distributing the films to make public disclosure of the names of certain recipients and exhibitors. The principal questions presented are, preliminarily, the standing of the present appellants to challenge these actions, and, on the merits, the lawfulness of these actions under the statute and under the first amendment.

I

Appellant Mitchell Block is…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Department of Commerce v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Meese v. KeeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Wedges/ledges of California, Inc. A California Corporation v. City of Phoenix, Arizona, a MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. National Wrestling Coaches Ass'n v. Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API