Legal Opinion
Cloutier v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 30, 2012No. 2010-714PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Horton, J.,
retired, specially assigned under RSA 490:3. The State appeals the Superior Court’s (Brown, J.) ruling that RSA chapter 100-C (Supp. 2011), the Judicial Retirement Plan, violates Part I, Article 23 of the New Hampshire Constitution. The petitioner and intervenors cross-appeal the court’s ruling that salary raises provided for by Laws 2003, 311:3 and Laws 2005,177:96 should not be included in calculating benefits under the prior retirement statutes. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
The petitioner, Raymond A. Cloutier, is a retired probate court judge. The six…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Campbell v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- William Bovaird v. New Hampshire Department of Administrative ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- American Federation of Teachers – New Hampshire & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Justus v. StateColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re Southern New Hampshire Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.