Legal Opinion

State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 2, 2015No. 2013-0591 and 2013-0668PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, C.J.

The defendants, Exxon Mobil Corporation and Exxon-Mobil Oil Corporation (collectively, either Exxon or ExxonMobil), appeal-from a jury verdict awarding approximately $236 million in damages due to groundwater contamination to the plaintiff, the State of New Hampshire, after a trial in Superior Court {Fauver, J.). The State cross-appeals from the trial court’s order imposing a trust upon approximately $195 million of the damages award. We affirm the trial court’s rulings on the merits and reverse its imposition of a trust.

I. Background

In 1990, Congress amended the Federal Clean Air Act to…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rhode Island v. Atl. Richfield Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018
  2. State v. Sean McInnisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  3. Maryland v. Exxon Mobil Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  4. Alice Finn v. Ballentine Partners, LLC & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
  5. Aranosian Oil Co., Inc. & a. v. State of New HampshireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API