Legal Opinion

Swink v. Lasiter Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 22, 2006No. CA 05-563PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert J. Gladwin, Judge.

Appellant Jim Swink appeals Jrom a jury verdict awarding appellee Lasiter Construction a judgment for $60,500 for money Swink withheld as liquidated damages for delays in a construction project. The jury also awarded Lasiter $6,941.85 for additional landscape work. The trial court awarded Lasiter $71,037.40 in attorney’s fees after reducing the hourly rates charged by Lasiter’s attorneys and paralegals. Lasiter cross-appeals from the fee award, alleging that the hourly rates were reasonable. We affirm in part and reverse in part on direct appeal. We reverse and remand…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Marcum v. WengertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conway Commercial Warehousing, LLC v. Fedex Freight East, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  2. Tiner v. TinerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Herrington v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Bishop v. Tariq, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API