Legal Opinion
Holloway v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 10, 2002No. AC 22029PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
The petitioner, Anthony Holloway, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which he claimed that he had been denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel. The petitioner *246claims that the court improperly dismissed his claim that appellate counsel was ineffective because counsel failed to apprise our Supreme Court of the precedent of Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 107 S. Ct. 708, 93 L. Ed. 2d 649 (1987).2 We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. HollowaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lemoine v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Holloway v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002