Legal Opinion

State v. Asberry

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 13, 2004No. AC 22476PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

In this criminal appeal, the defendant challenges the validity of his conviction of conspiracy to commit assault in the first degree. He raises two principal issues. As a matter of fact, he argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for conspiracy because the jury acquitted him of the under*46lying charge of assault in the fust degree. As a matter of law, he argues that he could not be convicted of conspiracy when the state never charged any other person as a coconspirator. We affirm the judgment of the trial corut.

In a two count information, the state…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. DecaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. State v. MerriamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. ByrdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MillanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. State v. SanchezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. State v. FlanaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. Moon v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API