Legal Opinion
Huff ex rel. Proposed Minnesota Rule 23 class v. Pinstripes, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 26, 2013No. Civil No. 11-CV-3681 (SRN/JJK)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 47] and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 51].1 For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs motion is granted in part and denied in part and Defendant’s motion is *1067granted in part, denied in part, and denied without prejudice in part.
I. BACKGROUND
In this diversity jurisdiction labor law case, Plaintiff Jamal Huff challenges the tip-pooling practice of his former employer, Defendant Pinstripes, Inc. (“Pinstripes”). Huff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.