Southtown Plumbing, Inc. v. Har-Ned Lumber Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellants were subcontractors on a residential construction project. Respondents financed the project. The owner/contractor failed to pay appellants for their labor, claiming that respondents had wrongfully refused to furnish the final payments of funding for the project. Appellants brought suit against respondents, claiming unjust enrichment. Following appellants’ ease in chief, the trial court granted respondents’ motion for directed verdict and dismissed the claim with prejudice and on the merits. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants, five subcontractors, provided labor and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Minnesota State Zoological BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- In Re STEVENSON ASSOCIATES, INC., Debtor. Charles W. STEVENSON, Appellant, v. STEVENSON ASSOCIATES, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Chemlease Worldwide Inc. v. Brace, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Walton v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Anderson v. DeLisleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Drobnak v. Andersen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Commerce v. EquityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Guinness Import Company v. Mark Vii Distributors, Inc., Third-Party v. Desnoes & Geddes, Ltd., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- In re Baycol Products LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.