Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co. v. City of Anderson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1894No. 16,857PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, C. J.

This was a suit by the appellant to enjoin the extension of Seventh street, in said city, from the east line of the appellant’s right of way westward across the main track, and five side tracks in appellant’s yards. Within said yards were an engine house of brick and stone, containing six stalls, and being sixty feet deep, eighty feet long in front, and one hundred and forty feet long in the rear; in front'of this building was a turn table from' which there were six tracks extending into said engine house, and connecting with six stalls *491therein. In said yards was also a water tank from which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matter of City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. The Albany Northern Railroad Company v. . BrownellNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Matter of Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. City of Fort Wayne v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Sabine & East Texas Railway Co. v. Gulp & Interstate Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Gold v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Steele v. EmpsomIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Marsh Mining Co. v. Inland Empire Mining & Milling Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API