Legal Opinion

City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1897No. 17,915PublishedCited by 57 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This is an appeal from a temporary injunction granted March 1,1896, by the court below on motion of appellee, restraining appellant from taking any steps to extend Ohio street in the city of Terre Haute, across appellee’s freight yard and fourteen tracks used for switching and storing cars and loading and unloading the same.

*176The question presented is one of jurisdiction. If the city officers had jurisdiction, injunction will not lie. But if the city had no authority to extend Ohio street across said freight yard and tracks already devoted to a public use, there was no jurisdiction, and…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Beekman v. Saratoga & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Santo v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Waldo v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. People ex rel. Attorney General v. ProvinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  2. In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. State ex rel. White v. BarkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  4. In re the Appointment of a Revisor of the StatutesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Martin v. Ben Davis Conservancy DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 1958

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API