Legal Opinion

Sabine & East Texas Railway Co. v. Gulp & Interstate Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1898No. 668PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Questions cebtified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Jefferson County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

The Court of Civil Appeals for the First Supreme Judicial District has certified to this court the following statement and questions:

“On the 26th of November, 1897, the appellee instituted proceedings, by presenting a petition to the county judge of Jefferson County, to condemn a crossing over appellant’s road and right of way and land acquired for yard purposes, in the city of Beaumont. The alleged necessity for the condemnation was to connect the main line of the appellee’s road with the Texarkana & Fort Smith Railway in the said city. The ■condemnation sought was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co. v. City of AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. In re Proceedings by the Boston, Hoosac Tunnel & Western Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Fort Worth & Rio Grande Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Austin Independent School District v. Sierra ClubTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Fort Worth Improvement District No. 1 v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Canyon Regional Water Authority v. Guadalupe-Blanco River AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Kingsville Independent School Dist. v. CrenshawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Texas & N. O. R. v. City of BeaumontCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API