Legal Opinion
Goldrich, Kest & Stern v. City of San Fernando
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 27, 1985No. CV 82-1653-RJKPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
KELLEHER, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of City of San Fernando (“San Fernando” or “City”) for attorney’s fees. Plaintiff Goldrich, Kest & Stern (“Developer”) filed this suit in April, 1982, alleging a number of civil rights violations. On March 14, 1985 the Court granted City’s motion for summary judgment in its entirety; a Memorandum Decision (“Decision”) entered on May 28, 1985, explained the Court’s ruling. The City now seeks those attorney’s fees incurred in the preparation of defense of this action. Having carefully considered…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Michigan Flyer LLC v. Wayne County Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Washington State Republican Party v. Public Disclosure CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Harris v. MarshDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1987
- In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Glades, Inc. v. GLADES COUNTRY CLUB APTS. ASS'N, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.