Washington State Republican Party v. Public Disclosure Commission
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
— The Washington State Public Disclosure Commission (Commission) appeals a superior court judgment that the Washington State Republican Party (Party) did not violate RCW 42.17.640 when it used exempt funds to purchase a television commercial critical of then candidate Gary Locke prior to the 1996 gubernatorial election. The Commission contends the superior court erred in reading the statute as allowing funds in excess of contribution limits to be used for the political advertisement.
This case arises at a time of tremendous national debate about campaign finance reform, especially around the…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- San Juan County v. No New Gas TaxWashington Supreme Court · 2007
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.