Legal Opinion
State v. King
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 22, 1986No. WD 36983PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge.
Bernard King was convicted on two counts of sales of marijuana in violation of § 195.020, RSMo.Cum.Supp.1984. He appeals contending the exhibit consisting of the contraband should not have been received in evidence and that a tape recording made during one of the sales and received in evidence at trial was given undue emphasis during jury deliberations. Affirmed.
The facts of the offense and preceding and subsequent events are integral components of the primary point on appeal, the asserted taint of the exhibit necessary to establish sale of the controlled substance. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. William Christopher Twigg, Iii, United States of America v. Henry Alfred NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Vincent Realty Corp. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- State v. HohenseeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. StahlNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. DunaganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- State v. PollardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. ShannonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Brayfield v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.