Legal Opinion

Brayfield v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1987No. 15017PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLANIGAN, Judge.

Movant, Pamela Sue (Hurd) Brayfield, appeals from a denial, after evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 27.26 1 motion to set aside a judgment and sentence for distribution of a controlled substance (§ 195.020 RSMo 1978 — now repealed and replaced). This court affirmed the conviction in State v. Hurd, 660 S.W.2d 388 (Mo.App.1983).

Movant’s first point is that the trial court erred in ruling that the evidence [at the motion hearing] was insufficient to show “outrageous police conduct,” and in failing to grant relief on that ground, because the "uncontroverted evidence” showed:(1)…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Stokes v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State v. HohenseeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Forshee v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. ShannonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State v. WaringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Malady v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API