Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 22, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2155PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in an action for declaratory relief. Plaintiff suffered injuries as a result of colliding with a bale of wire that had fallen off an unidentified flat-bed truck. Aetna’s policy obligates it to pay all sums which the insured would be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile because of bodily injury sustained by the insured arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of the uninsured automobile. The policy states that the term “uninsured automobile” includes a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Balestrieri v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Lawrence v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Mazon v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. Regent Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Hill v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Progressive Classic Insurance v. BlaudCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API