Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 6, 1982No. 1 CA-CIV 5340PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

R. PORTER MURRY, Judge (Retired).

Paul Anderson and Dusty Ellington appealed from the granting of a summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Insurance Company. This appeal challenges the right of State Farm to limit its liability under its uninsured motor vehicle coverage to exclude damages caused by an unidentified vehicle which has caused another vehicle to be propelled into the insured’s vehicle.

The facts in this case are undisputed. On February 15, 1978, appellants Paul Anderson and Dusty Ellington were occupying a motor vehicle which was stopped in traffic at the intersection…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. EisenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Balestrieri v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Gardner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. Deville, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  4. Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. Deville, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API