Progressive Classic Insurance v. Blaud
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNOW, Judge.
¶ 1 Progressive Classic Insurance Company appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Peter F. Blaud determining that Blaud’s uninsured motorist insurance issued by Progressive provides coverage for Blaud’s claim. For the following reasons, we affirm that part of the trial court’s judgment that determines that Blaud complied with the requirements of Arizona’s Uninsured Motorist Act (“UMA”), Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 20-259.01 (Supp.2005), but reverse the trial court’s determination that, as a matter of law, Blaud’s uninsured motorist coverage…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Allstate Insurance v. KillakeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Theis v. Midwest Security InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Blankenbaker v. Great Central Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Southern Farm Bur. Cas. Ins. v. BrewerMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lennar Corp. v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- ACMAT Corp. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. BaldwinKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Burke v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Nationwide Insurance Co. v. ElchehimiTexas Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.