Legal Opinion

Lukens Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 8, 1992No. 1199 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

Lukens Steel Corporation (Lukens) appeals from two orders of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB), the first order reversing the referee’s decision and remanding for additional findings of fact, 1 and the second order affirming the referee’s award of benefits to claimant, Tommy D. Price (Price), based on a work-related psychiatric disability under Section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915. P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 411. 2 We reverse.

Price had been employed by Lukens as a crane operator since 1973 when, in the Fall of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Bell Telephone Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Bevilacqua v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frog, Switch & Manufacturing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Antus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Lowe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Birenbaum v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Boring v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API