Legal Opinion

Boring v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 23, 1993No. 1529 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Wayne H. Boring (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s decision dismissing his claim petition. The issue raised on appeal is whether the referee’s finding that Claimant failed to establish the causal relationship between his alleged mental illness and employment is supported by substantial evidence.1

*279Claimant had been intermittently assigned through the local union to work for Combustion Engineering, Inc. (Employer) as a welder since 1972, and for at least two years prior to September 25, 1984, the date of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Lewis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Cardyn v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Signorini v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Washington Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Selkow v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Viwinco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API