Legal Opinion

Graham v. Bottenfield's, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1954No. 39,292PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This was an action to recover for injuries alleged to have been sustained from the use of a hair preparation, known as “Miss Clairol.” The defendant. appeals from an order overruling its demurrer to the petition.

Failure of the petition to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is the sole issue involved on appeal. For that reason, because it discloses the factual situation, about as clearly as it could be described in narrative form, and definitely outlines the legal theory on which plaintiff bases her right to relief, we…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Swengel v. F. & E. Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Lukens v. FreiundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. Craver v. HornburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Frier v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API