Legal Opinion

Frier v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1953No. 38,706PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, C. J.:

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries to her hand and medical attention resulting from the use of “Tide,” manufactured by one of the defendants and distributed by the other, while washing dishes in a restaurant. She initiated the case April 6, 1951, by filing a bill of particulars in the city court against the distributing company only. A trial there resulted in a judgment in plaintiff’s favor, and defendant appealed to the district court. There the manufacturing company was made an additional party defendant, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burks v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Graham v. Bottenfield's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. Elizabeth Margaret Dallison and Max Dallison v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Bereman v. BurdolskiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Phillip Burgess v. Montgomery Ward and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API