Legal Opinion
Bays v. Shenango Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 22, 1990No. 89-1198PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
R.C. 4141.29(D)(1)(a) provides in part:
“Notwithstanding division (A) of this section, no individual may serve a waiting period or be paid benefits under the following conditions:
“(1) For any week with respect to which the administrator finds that:
“(a) His unemployment was due to a labor dispute other than a lockout at any factory, establishment, or other premises located in this or any other state and owned and operated by the employer by which he is or was last employed; and for so long as his unemployment is due to such labor dispute. * * *” (Emphasis added.)
Appellants contend that because…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Philco Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Iron Molders' Union No. 125 of Milwaukee v. Allischalmers Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
- Baker v. Powhatan Mining Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
- Barnes v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smittle v. GatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Young v. Washington Local School District Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Abate v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Abrams-Rodkey v. Summit County Children ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Hi-State Beverage Co. v. Ohio Bureau of Employment ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.