Legal Opinion

Baker v. Powhatan Mining Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1946No. 30513PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The claims for unemployment compensation involved herein cover the period of the suspension of the operation of coal mines resulting from a controversy between workmen and operator." At the threshholcl of a consideration of this case, let it be clearly understood that there is no issue as to the right of workmen to bargain collectively through their authorized representatives and no question of their right to refuse to continue their employment whenever for any reason they choose so to do. It is the well settled and unquestioned right of workmen, unless in violation of an existing contract,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Miners in General Group v. HixWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Walter Bledsoe Coal Co. v. Review Board of Employment Security Division of Department of TreasuryIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Board of Review v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Petro v. GoldOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Sakrison v. PierceArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Moulton v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  5. Youngstown Club v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API